The year 2026 will not be defined by incremental upgrades. It will be shaped by an unprecedented collision of forces: next-generation computing, hyper-automation, and a global cyber security reckoning. Technological convergence and the rise of autonomous systems will redefine global resilience.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a single discipline. It has become the connective tissue linking cloud, networks, and physical systems. Quantum research is challenging the fundamental mathematics of digital trust, while Web 4.0 is transforming the internet into an immersive, always-on layer of reality.
This report highlights the key forces identified by Check Point’s researchers, strategists, and regional leaders for the year ahead. Each prediction examines how risk is evolving and how prevention-first, AI-driven security architectures can help organizations stay one step ahead.
Prediction 1 – The Dawn of Agentic AI: From Assistants to Autonomy
David Haber, Vice President AI Agent Security, Check Point
The year 2026 marks the mainstreaming of agentic AI, autonomous systems able to reason, plan, and act with minimal human input. We are moving from assistants that draft content to agents that execute strategy. These systems will allocate budgets, monitor production lines, or reroute logistics, all in real time. Factories will self-diagnose faults and order parts automatically through blockchain-verified networks. Marketing, finance, and security functions will rely on agents that learn continuously from contextual data and act at machine speed.
Autonomy without accountability is a liability. As agents gain operational authority, new governance gaps emerge: who validates their actions, audits their logic, or intervenes when intent diverges from outcome? Enterprises will need AI governance councils, strong policy guardrails, and immutable audit trails that record every autonomous decision.
Enterprise implication: success depends on observability and policy guardrails. Without them, autonomous efficiency becomes unmanaged risk.
Check Point view: In 2026, the competition is between autonomous adversaries and autonomous defenders. Winning enterprises will govern AI with the same rigor they secure data, visibility, ethics, and prevention-by-design.
Supporting insight: The World Economic Forum’s Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2025 cites “AI autonomy without governance” as one of the top three systemic risks to enterprise resilience.
Prediction 2 – Web 4.0 Foundations: Immersive, Integrated and Intelligent – Digital twins and XR redefine how humans interact with infrastructure
Nataly Kremer, Chief Product and Technology Officer, Check Point
While a fully realized Web 4.0 is still emerging, 2026 will lay its foundations. This next-generation web blends spatial computing, digital twins, and AI at the operating-system level.
Entire cities, industrial plants, and corporate campuses will function through real-time virtual models, enabling engineers to simulate maintenance, test security patches, or visualize risk scenarios before touching the physical environment. Extended-reality interfaces, augmented and virtual, will replace dashboards, allowing staff to walk through data rather than read it.
This convergence promises vast efficiency and safety gains but introduces complex interoperability challenges. Disparate systems and standards must communicate seamlessly; otherwise, visibility becomes fragmented and exploitable.
Enterprise implication: Web 4.0 demands unified security models that protect both data and the immersive interfaces employees depend on.
Check Point view: As the digital world becomes spatial and persistent, the attack surface extends into experience itself. Security must follow users into every layer of immersion.
Supporting insight: According to Gartner’s Emerging Technologies 2025, 40 % of large enterprises will pilot digital-twin or XR-based operations by 2026.
Prediction 3 – AI Becomes a Strategic Decision Engine
Roi Karo, Chief Strategy Officer, Check Point
AI is steadily changing the foundations of cyber security. What once served mainly as a tool for operational efficiency is now influencing how both attackers and defenders plan, adapt, and execute. The industry is moving into a phase where AI is no longer a supporting capability, but an embedded element in detection, analysis, and decision-making workflows.
In 2026, this evolution is expected to deepen. Attackers are already using AI to generate faster, broader, and more tailored campaigns, and this will increasingly push organizations to develop defensive capabilities that can match that pace – with continuous learning, real-time context, and more autonomous operational support. It reflects a shift in how security teams prioritize actions, understand risk, and coordinate response. The same capabilities that empower attackers also strengthen defense teams.
AI is becoming an operational layer within security operations, enhancing human expertise, simplifying manual workflows, and reducing mean time to remediation (MTTR). It helps bridge skill gaps and enables prevention and detection that match the pace of modern threats.
Enterprise implication: Organizations should prioritize solutions that not only secure AI but also integrate it across their entire platform under a clear and unified AI strategy. This ensures long-term adaptability and positions them to fully benefit from future advances in AI technologies.
Check Point view: The accelerated adoption of AI is making it part of the operational backbone of cyber security rather than an extension of existing tools, shaping analytical workflows and decision-making processes to be more consistent, automated, and guided by clear controls.
Prediction 4 – Trust Is the New Perimeter: Deepfakes and Conversational Fraud
Pete Nicoletti, Field CISO and Evangelist, Check Point
Generative AI has blurred the line between genuine and fabricated. A cloned voice can authorize a transfer; a synthetic, AI-created real-time video can request privileged access; and a persuasive chat interaction with corporate process awareness can bypass multi-factor authentication altogether.
Technical authenticity no longer guarantees human authenticity. Every human-machine interface becomes a potential compromise point. Business email compromise will evolve into trust-based fraud conducted with deepfakes, adaptive language and emotional triggers.
Enterprise implication: Identity security must shift from credential verification to behavioral validation, device consistency, geolocation and interaction patterns.
Check Point view: In 2026, deception will sound like trust. Enterprises must continuously verify identity, context, and intent across every interaction. AI will create both the threat and the safeguard.
Supporting insight: ENISA’s Threat Landscape 2025 lists “synthetic identity and AI-generated social engineering” among the top five risk vectors for European enterprises.
Prediction 5 – LLM-Native Threats: Prompt Injection and Data Poisoning – AI Models Become the New Zero-Day
Jonathan Zanger, Chief Technology Officer, Check Point
As enterprises embed generative AI into everything from customer service to threat hunting, the models themselves have become attack surfaces. In 2026, adversaries will exploit prompt injection, inserting hidden instructions into text, code or documents that manipulate an AI system’s output, and data poisoning, where corrupted data is used to bias or compromise training sets. These attacks blur the boundary between vulnerability and misinformation, allowing threat actors to subvert an organization’s logic without touching its infrastructure.
Because many LLMs operate via third-party APIs, a single poisoned dataset can propagate across thousands of applications. Traditional patching offers no defense; model integrity must be maintained continuously.
Enterprise implication: CISOs must treat AI models as critical assets. This means securing the entire lifecycle, from data provenance and training governance to runtime validation and output filtering. Continuous red-teaming of models, zero-trust data flows, and clear accountability for AI behavior will become standard practice.
Check Point view: AI models are today’s unpatched systems. Every external data source becomes a potential exploit. True AI security is not about building smarter models, but about governing and validating them relentlessly.
Supporting insight: The OECD AI Principles Update 2025 calls for traceability and robustness standards to counter data-poisoning and model-manipulation risks.
Prediction 6 – The AI Reality Check
Mateo Rojas-Carulla, Head of Research, AI Agent Security, Check Point
After two years of near-frantic AI adoption, 2026 will mark the first major recalibration. Many organizations that rushed to integrate generative AI tools will discover ungoverned systems, exposed APIs, and compliance blind spots. Shadow AI, employee-initiated tools using corporate data, will proliferate, creating invisible data leaks and inconsistent security standards.
This phase of disillusionment is necessary: it will drive the shift from experimentation to accountability. Executives will begin demanding AI value measured in outcomes, not hype. AI assurance frameworks will emerge across sectors, requiring formal audits for fairness, robustness and security. AI Assurance Frameworks, auditable standards for transparency, fairness and security, will emerge across sectors and become part of mainstream corporate governance.
Enterprise implication: Leadership teams must establish clear policies for AI use and align them with legal, ethical and risk frameworks. Responsible deployment will hinge on explainability and continuous validation, not unchecked automation. Compliance will expand from privacy to algorithmic accountability.
Check Point view: AI’s first disruption was speed; its second will be governance. 2026 will reward those who treat AI not as a shortcut but as a capability to be secured, audited and improved.
Supporting insight: The UK Government AI Assurance Framework (2025) emphasizes that confidence in AI depends on transparency, oversight and security-by-design — all of which are now business imperatives.
Prediction 7 – Regulation and Accountability Expand – Cyber Resilience Becomes a License to Operate
Peter Sandkuijl, Vice President, Western Europe Engineering, Check Point Evangelist
Regulators worldwide are closing the gap between innovation and accountability. In 2026, regulation ceases to be reactive. Frameworks such as the EU’s NIS2 Directive, the AI Act, and the U.S. SEC incident-disclosure rules will converge on a single principle: cyber security must be measurable and demonstrable in real time. Governments will now expect continuous proof of resilience. Organizations are expected to prove that preventive controls, incident-response plans, and data-protection measures are continuously enforced.
There is a strong reason behind this regulatory acceleration: society’s growing dependency on digital services to keep daily life and the economy running without major disruptions. Business resiliency has become the true driver behind the increase in compliance requirements.
This shift will end the era of “annual compliance.” Enterprises will rely on automated compliance monitoring, machine-readable policies, real-time attestations, and AI-based risk analytics. Boards and CEOs will carry personal responsibility for oversight.
Enterprise implication: CISOs will need to connect risk, compliance and operational telemetry into a unified governance dashboard. Continuous assurance will replace static certification.
Check Point view: Cyber resilience is no longer paperwork, it’s performance. The ability to demonstrate protection continuously will determine market access and trust.
Supporting insight: The European Commission’s NIS2 Directive Overview sets mandatory risk-management and incident-reporting standards for over 160,000 entities, underscoring that cyber resilience is now a legal obligation.
Prediction 8 – The Quantum Sprint – Preparing for the Day Encryption Breaks
Ian Porteous, Regional Director, Sales Engineering UK and Ireland, Check Point Evangelist
Quantum computing may still be years from cracking today’s encryption, but the threat has already changed enterprise behavior. Governments, cloud providers, and large enterprises are racing to secure cryptographic agility, migrating from vulnerable Rivest–Shamir–Adleman (RSA) and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) algorithms to post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards before adversaries can weaponize them.
The danger lies in the harvest-now, decrypt-later (HNDL) strategy. Attackers are already stealing encrypted data today, confident that quantum decryption will expose it tomorrow. Intellectual property, state secrets, and health records could all be compromised retrospectively once quantum systems reach maturity.
In 2026, preparation moves from theory to execution. Boards will fund cryptographic bills of materials (CBOMs) to catalogue every algorithm, certificate, and key across their environments. Organizations will pilot National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-approved post-quantum algorithms and pressure vendors to show clear migration timelines.
Enterprise implication: Quantum readiness is now a compliance and continuity requirement. Delaying migration could expose years of sensitive information once quantum computing achieves scale.
Check Point view: Quantum risk is not about tomorrow’s machines. It is about today’s data. Every organization must assume their encrypted assets are already being harvested and prepare for a world where prevention depends on cryptographic agility.
Supporting insight: The NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standardisation Project finalized four PQC algorithms in 2025, marking the start of global adoption across finance, defense, and government sectors.
Prediction 9 – Ransomware Evolves into Data-Pressure Operations – Extortion Replaces Encryption
Paal Aaserudseter, Sales Engineer, Check Point Evangelist
Ransomware has evolved from encryption to psychological coercion. Attackers now exfiltrate sensitive data, pressure victims through regulators, customers or the press and strategically time leaks for maximum impact.
These data-pressure operations rely on fear, not disruption. Legal liability, reputational damage and regulatory scrutiny often exceed the cost of ransom payments.
Enterprise implication: Incident response must combine legal strategy, communications, rapid validation of stolen data and exposure-prevention measures.
Check Point view: Attackers no longer lock your data. They weaponize your reputation. True resilience requires preventing exfiltration, not just restoring backups.
Supporting insight: The IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025 shows 30 % of incidents involved data-leak extortion, driving average costs to USD 4.88 million.
Prediction 10 – Supply Chain and Saas Risk Explodes
Jayant Dave, Field CISO, APAC, Check Point Evangelist
2026 will confirm that no enterprise operates alone. Every vendor, API, and integration adds new risk. Adversaries exploit these dependencies to compromise thousands of organizations simultaneously, turning the weakest supplier into an entry point for mass exploitation.
At the same time, global supply chains are transforming under the pressure of automation. Agentic AI will enable autonomous risk management: self-learning systems that map dependencies, monitor third-party compliance, and predict disruptions. Yet hyperconnectivity also magnifies exposure: compromised code libraries, API tokens, and cloud credentials can ripple through ecosystems faster than incidents can be traced.
Enterprise implication: Visibility must be extended to fourth-party suppliers, your suppliers’ suppliers. Continuous monitoring, automated vendor scoring, and contractual security clauses will replace static questionnaires.
Check Point view: Your exposure is only as small as our least secure partner. In 2026, prevention must extend across the entire value chain — because every trusted connection is also an attack surface.
Supporting insight: The ENISA Supply-Chain Cybersecurity Report 2025 warns that 62 % of large organizations experienced at least one third-party compromise in the past 12 months.
Prediction 11 – Evolving Initial Access Vectors – The Rise of Edge-Device Compromise and AI-Powered Identity Attacks
Sergey Shykevich, Group Manager, Threat Intelligence
Sophisticated state-sponsored adversaries will continue to prioritize exploiting edge devices- such as routers, cameras, IoT systems, and firewalls, using these silent footholds to penetrate high-value environments without triggering traditional detection controls.
Meanwhile, most of the actors, and especially cyber criminal groups will focus on multi-channel, AI-powered social engineering, using generative models to create persuasive communication, adaptive interaction patterns, and convincing digital personas across email, messaging, voice, and support channels.
The most disruptive shift will stem from AI-driven identity attacks, which mimic human behavior at scale, including voice, writing style, interaction history, contextual cues, and digital movement patterns. These capabilities will erode today’s identity, verification, and KYC systems, which depend on static signals and point-in-time checks. When an AI system can generate a coherent, persistent, and reactive identity, legacy verification becomes ineffective.
Enterprise implication: Organizations must shift to continuous identity validation based on behavioral signals, contextual scoring and real-time anomaly detection.
Check Point view: Initial access is shifting from malware to manipulation. In 2026, attackers won’t just target systems, they will target identities, behaviors, and the weak points between people and technology. Defending against this requires continuous validation, not one-time checks.
Prediction 12 – Prompt Injection Becomes the Primary Attack Vector
Lotem Finkelstein, Director, Threat Intelligence and Research
By 2026, direct and indirect prompt injection will become the primary attack vector against AI systems, driven by the rise of AI browsers and the rapid adoption of agentic AI services. Attackers are increasingly embedding malicious instructions inside ordinary content, documents, files, vendor reports, websites, ads, and external data streams, turning powerful AI tools into unwitting resources for malicious activity.
As agentic AI services consume more external information to make autonomous decisions, attackers can embed hidden commands in ordinary content to influence those decisions. This makes it possible to hijack workflows, redirect actions, or coerce AI agents into performing tasks they were never intended or authorized to do. The growth of indirect prompt injection campaigns already demonstrates how quickly this technique is moving from theoretical discussion to practical exploitation.
Internally developed, agentic services amplify this exposure. These systems constantly read, interpret, and act on information from external sources; when that information is manipulated, the agent’s logic can be subverted, leading to unauthorized actions, exposure of sensitive data, or disruption of critical business processes. Recent attacks targeting AI-driven analytics platforms illustrate how easily these agents can be misled and weaponized.
Enterprise implication: Organizations must secure the information pathways feeding AI, applying strict filtering, validation and guardrails.
Check Point view: As AI browsers mature and agentic AI become embedded across enterprises, any information processed by these systems becomes an attack surface. Continuous filtering and oversight will be essential to ensure safe and trustworthy AI operations.
The Great Convergence: Resilience And Risk in a Hyperconnected Era
The defining reality of 2026 is convergence. AI agents automate decisions. Web 4.0 connects physical and virtual environments. Quantum computing threatens the cryptographic backbone of trust. These technologies are colliding, creating an environment where innovation and instability grow together.
Critical infrastructure resilience: energy, telecom and transport networks increasingly depend on digital twins and predictive AI. Governments will enforce unified security standards and invest in shared crisis-simulation platforms.
Autonomous supply chains: real-time AI oversight will enable self-healing logistics but will also create shared-risk ecosystems demanding federated security models.
Systemic resilience: continuity must be designed into every layer of operations. Resilience becomes a living process driven by adaptive intelligence.
Redefining Prevention, Governance and Resilience
The convergence of AI, quantum and immersive technologies requires a new philosophy of cyber security. Check Point’s four principles provide the foundation:
- Prevention-First: Anticipate and block attacks before they happen.
- AI-First Security: Harness intelligence responsibly to stay ahead of autonomous threats.
- Securing the Connectivity Fabric: Protect every device, data flow and cloud service as one ecosystem.
- Open Platform: Unify visibility, analytics and control across the enterprise.
Organizations that adopt these principles will move from reacting to threats to governing them. This is the balance of autonomy and accountability that will define digital resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Executive Action Checklist for 2026
- Establish an AI Governance Council to oversee agentic AI systems.
- Launch a Digital Twin Pilot in a critical business area.
- Initiate a PQC Inventory Project aligned with NIST standards.
- Invest in AI-powered security that predicts and prevents threats.
- Adopt continuous vendor assurance with automated risk scoring.
- Train teams for effective human-machine collaboration.
By embedding prevention, transparency and agility throughout the enterprise, organizations can navigate the 2026 technology tsunami and emerge stronger on the other side.
Deixe o seu comentário